Connecticut "The Fearful State" Rather Than "The Constitution State"

Connecticut should be renamed "The Fearful State" rather than "The Constitution State".  Why? Our state constitution has little meaning or value to the omnipotent one party rule of Connecticut's public unions and the Connecticut Democrat Party.  Thus we should change the nickname of the state to "The Fearful State".  I wonder why this change was not included in the recent sham Connecticut State Legislative session that was just held rather than the supposedly more critical issues of the stripping of personal liabilities for local police and stuff the ballot box with illegal votes through absentee ballots to help keep one party rule safe for the Connecticut Democrat Party for two more years?
"The Fearful State" sends a strong message to those who must live in constant fear here in Connecticut.  Fear everything and anything as we are told by Boston Consulting Group and Ned Lamont.  The new big fear is that if we vote in person we all will most likely get Covid-19 and we must therefore vote by paper ballot and drop it off in our safe outdoor ballot box provided by the Secretary of the State. Why isn't the process that has worked for years not be followed which is absentee ballots that are mailed in and verified by our Registrars of Voters?  It is too foolproof?  How are we safeguarding our elections through this process?  No explanations needed when it comes to making the system work to the advantage of the Connecticut Democrat Party.
"The Fearful State" can also be used during the never ending Covid-19 crisis.  What is Ned Lamont's plan to reopen the state?  Is there such a plan?  I believe most businesses and legal taxpayers would like to know and also have much more frequent updates as to what our state government is actually doing to respond to this supposed crisis.  Do we actually have a working Connecticut Public Health Commissioner?  Do we have to wait until yet another Boston Consulting Group report gets issued and read by Lamont to act?  Or what New York Democrat Governor Cuomo enacts before Lamont acts?  Or do we need more Lamont hedge fund related companies to create something or get no bid state contracts before the next steps are made in Hartford?  Or how about some good old political fundraising thrown into the mix by the Connecticut Democrat Party during this crisis?
"The Fearful State" can also be used during the 2020 re election of all things Connecticut Democrat Party.  As was reported this week a mere $900,000. was spent in mailed pieces to tell the remaining legal Connecticut Taxpayers and voters what a great job their sometimes State House and Senate Representatives are doing during the Covid-19 crisis.  Who would want to question the value of this investment of yet another $900,000. of Connecticut Taxpayers Monies at a time when Connecticut has a mere $145 billion dollars in short and long term debt along with unfunded liabilities?  Why isn't it much more important to keep the same stale government in power ad infinitum (forever) then to try to do something different to help Connecticut gain jobs and get back on its feet economically?
Why must Connecticut become "The Fearful State"?
Why can't Connecticut show a fearless nature and get moving again in the right economic direction?
A false narrative and a false state government are the reasons.  Enough is enough.