What’s
a month? And another month? And another month? What’s flattening the
curve? Or we just need to flatten the curve some more? What profits
have been made by the Lamont’s Hedge Fund since he has issued his first
of many Executive Orders? Why do Federal funds supposedly stop when our
State Legislature actually meets again in person and are allowed to
govern as stated in the Connecticut State Constitution?
Executive
Order Governor Ned Lamont’s ruling and infinite power is supposed to
end on April 20th. For over one year now Lamont has done everything and
anything he wanted through his Executive Order power trip to supposedly
cure Connecticut of the Covid-19 virus. Connecticut through the
Connecticut Democrat Party’s eyes and voices supposedly led the country
in all aspects of combating this virus. Through the closing of the
economy placing it in a recession, the destruction of many small businesses and a virtual lock down
in the name of Executive Order Lamont decrees he theoretically saved
Connecticut from itself. Now when apparently “the curve has flattened”
on all things Covid-19, Ned along with Connecticut’s political elite
wish to extend his power of Executive Order for yet another month
apparently to continue the Federal funding that goes along with it.
Then what happens May 20th? Yet another extension? And another? On and
on and on? Forever?
During this time frame what has been lost is that the
Constitution of Connecticut does not permit its Legislature to grant
this Executive Order power without any type of limits as to what, how
and how long the Governor can perform these powers. Thus in my opinion
and many others the constitutional law of the state has been violated.
On
March 9, 2020 a 36-page decision, by Superior Court Judge Thomas Moukaws
stated: “This court believes the governor likely cannot continue to
carry out his emergency orders without some form of ratification and
control from the General Assembly." Given this legal ruling, Republican
State legislators proposed an amendment #6072 to House Bill 6672:“AN
ACT CONCERNING PUBLIC HEALTH AND CIVIL PREPAREDNESS EMERGENCIES DECLARED
AND RENEWED BY THE GOVERNOR.” Their amendment sought to make the
legislature active again as what is guaranteed by the Connecticut
Constitution a co-equal branch of government. Naturally this amendment
was voted down by the Democrat majority in Hartford and we are back to
business as usual yet another month of Ned Lamont’s Executive Orders now
until May 20th.
What is also interesting during this time
frame is that the not one person other than the investigative work of
Tony De Angelo (De Angelo is the managing director of the Paragon Trust
Company) on his weekly Tuesday report on the Lee Elci 94.9 FM radio show (949newsnow.com) questioned what was going on with Lamont and his hedge fund
and their behind the scenes dealings with Oak HC/FT, Sema 4, Truepill,
1Life or Lemonaid Health to name a few companies doing business with the
state during this Executive Order time frame. Lee Elci has now written two
columns in The Day newspaper (theday.com) discussing what Tony De Angelo
has brought to light about Ned Lamont’s no-bid contracts, huge profits
and multiple Cayman Islands accounts during the past 12 months. Maybe
Lamont and the defunct Legislature should read these pieces. And still
Connecticut Taxpayers get no answers from their Governor or shut down
Legislature and our state run media refuses to investigate this. And as
a reminder Connecticut still has $150 billion dollars in short and long
term debt along with unfunded liabilities that seems never to be
mentioned by anyone in power in Connecticut.
Thus
Connecticut’s legal State Constitution is meaningless to the Connecticut
Democrat Party. Executive Orders rule supreme. There are no laws apparently that the Connecticut Democrat Party needs to follow. And it is business as
usual for Ned Lamont and his hedge fund companies feeding profits off of
the Connecticut Taxpayers trough in the name of all things Covid-19.
Sickening isn’t it?
Free Connecticut from this theft or personal and economic freedoms.
No comments:
Post a Comment